The Economists’ Statement on Carbon Dividends

 

The Largest Declaration in the History of Economics

In Support of the Carbon Dividends Climate Solution


Featuring

3,500 US Economists

28 Nobel Prize Winners

4 Chairs of the Federal Reserve

15 Chairs of the White House Council of Economic Advisers

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

As Covered In

 

 

 
Untitled design (60).png
 

 

 

Testimonials

Truly remarkable
— Dr. Noah Kaufman (Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University
Basically every big deal US economist
— Kate Mackenzie (Fellow, Center for Policy Development)
Nearly every economist you’ve ever heard of
— Dr. Justin Wolfers (Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution)
People say economists don’t agree on everything, but here’s one thing we do agree on: Carbon Dividends
— Dr. Erik Brynjolfsson (Professor of Economics, MIT)
Perhaps the closest the economics profession has ever come to consensus
— University of Chicago Booth Review
If I wrote a list of the economists I most admire, it would look awfully similar to those who signed [the Economists’ Statement on Carbon Dividends]
— Michael R. Strain (Director of Economic Policy Studies, American Enterprise Institute)
A remarkable document
— Dr. John Cochrane (Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution at Stanford University)
Economists can be a contentious lot, but this is one area where there is sweeping agreement. Policies like carbon taxes and dividends yield as much consensus among economists as the reality of climate change does among scientists
— N. GREGORY MANKIW (HARVARD PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS & AUTHOR OF THE MOST POPULAR, WIDELY-USED ECONOMICS TEXTBOOK IN THE COUNTRY)
The largest public declaration in the history of economics
— Dr. Martin Ravallion (Professor of Economics, Georgetown University)
Bipartisan agreement on how to combat climate change
— The Wall Street Journal
 
 

 

 
 
 

 As Published In

Screen-Shot-2019-01-16-at-4.02.06-PM.jpg

The Statement

Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations.

I.          A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future.

II.         A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services.

III.        A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long- term investment in clean-energy alternatives.

IV.        To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing.

V.         To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

Endorsed by Professors from Hundreds of Campuses Across the Country

 
 


Endor

 


ECONOMIST-03.png